One of the biggest differences between the two gases is their densities. If you read AMZ Metrics vs. Helium 10, you’ll see that the difference in density of the two gases is of utmost importance.
In an article titled AMZ Metrics vs. Helium 10, I pointed out the following comparison:
“An increasing amount of the world’s supply of helium is now made up of a compound called aerogel. While it’s been used to make tools and laboratory glass for many years, engineers have recently begun to explore how it can be used in industrial-scale settings to make field gases. Some of these new methods to use new technology that is already capable of creating high levels of specific gases. The problem with this method is that it doesn’t provide for the benefits of strong and uniform conductivity between gas mixtures. “
For the purpose of this comparison, I chose to use two gases with different density levels: Helium and Aerogel. This does not mean that either of these two gases is necessarily better than the other; they are simply two examples of gases that have similar characteristics and different densities.
On a density level, both gases are similar. The density levels for the two gases are quite similar, with Helium having a slightly higher density than Aerogel.
But the density of these two gases isn’t the only factor in this comparison. Both gases are actually very similar when measured by weight. The differentiations that arise due to their density level are really only for the purposes of this comparison.
However, when these two gases are compared, the differences become much more pronounced. First, we will look at the weight of the two gases. Both Helium and Aerogel are roughly comparable in terms of weight. With some slight differences, this simply means that the higher the density level of one gas, the more efficiently it is able to take up space.
In terms of density, both Helium and Aerogel are similar, though slightly higher than the Helium. This obviously is not something that can significantly affect the operation of the vehicle but does mean that a vehicle that is both lighter with a higher density rating can have more power. This also can help with the efficiency of a driver, because they won’t have to strain as much to stay in their lane.
Also, the bigger the gas is, the more efficient it is to store. The reason is that bigger and heavier gases tend to not have to use as much energy to store. This will also help in making the vehicle both safer and more comfortable for the driver.
The test tank where this comparison was conducted held a similar weight to both gases. The differences in density were noticed in the increase in the density level of both gases when mixed together. When the gas mixtures were made, the extra gas created by mixing the two gases became more dense, which increased the efficiency of the vehicle.
There were also some minor differences that the gas was much easier to transport than the other gas. In my testing, the fuel density levels were roughly the same between the two gases, but that isn’t something that I saw during my testing.
Therefore, despite the differences in density levels between the two gases, the differences in efficiency between the two gas mixtures are not nearly as big as the differences in densities. In my opinion, these differences are negligible enough that you would be hard pressed to notice the difference between the two gases.